![]() |
Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search |
| |
| Reading Lolita in Tehran ( |
|
| |
|
| Author | Message |
|
Professor Berry
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jun 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
![]() Topic: Word PowerPosted: 21 Jul 2006 at 2:33pm |
|
Azar Nafisi really imagines books as quite powerful in Reading Lolita in Tehran. I think this is surprising and interesting. At one early point she says of the class she holds with her female students in Iran, "That room. . .became a place of transgression." She sees literature as life-changing.
What do you think? Can books be transformative? How so? Edited by Professor Berry - 25 Jul 2006 at 3:32pm |
|
|
(Professor) Laura Berry
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
E. Fioccoprile
Honors Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
![]() Posted: 08 Aug 2006 at 6:16pm |
|
I feel that literature is life-changing because it allows us to escape from reality, at least momentarily and/or superficially. A well-written book has the power to completely monopolize a reader's attention--the reader is so engrossed in that book that he or she is unwilling to tear him- or herself away to read another book. When I have just finished reading a particularly good book, I am reluctant to even start a new one because I feel like it will make me forget about the wonderful book I have just read. I am usually most drawn to literature that brings me to another place or time or situation, and if a book like this is written well enough, then it alters my views on the world in some way.
Reading Lolita in Tehran has profoundly awakened my sense of compassion for women living oppressed lives in foreign nations. Before I read this book, veiling and other strict laws that inhibited women's rights in the Middle East always seemed unfair, but they were impersonal and I could not say that I knew much about women's situations in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and other Middle Eastern countries. For me, the Middle East was the subject of history textbooks and newspaper articles. When I began reading this novel after receiving it at orientation, I started to feel a connection between my own life and the lives of the women Nafisi describes (including Nafisi herself). The struggles of these women finally became personal for me--something that never would have happened if I had continued to think of the Middle East as a distant, militant, unfair place that had no relation to my life.
In the James section of Reading Lolita in Tehran, Nafisi says that "at times [their] lives were more fictional than fiction itself." This line made me stop and think for a moment before I could continue reading, and I came to the conclusion that the girls had to be desperate for something better, and the only way they could find it was through literature that transported them to different situations that seem just as difficult to face as their own. In all of the novels Nafisi chose for the girls, the characters are faced with challenges that usually do not lead to happy endings, yet the characters survive nonetheless. I believe that this was probably a sign of hope for the girls, and it allowed them to escape from reality, while still teaching them something about life itself. The books they read were powerful enough to bring them together, to open up to each other. Literature gave them something to cling to when their government took everything else away, and their experiences generated a book that in turn touched my life.
|
|
Emily Fioccoprile
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Axalia
Honors Student
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
![]() Posted: 15 Aug 2006 at 10:37pm |
|
Literature was the only escape for Nafisi and her female students under the new regime. While the morality police were searching for the most minor infraction, the girls in the Thursday class were able to imagine a world much different. The novels Nafisi chooses to discuss: Lolita, The Great Gatsby and even Pride and Prejudice are not "happy" novels. Still, these works of fiction provided a security blanket and a means of expression for the women. In a world that gave them nothing, literature became an otherworld that provided them with endless possibilities.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
doseofcynicism
Honors Student
Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
![]() Posted: 16 Aug 2006 at 10:59pm |
|
After reading this book, I get the sneaking suspicion that people not familiar with the Middle East, like E. Fioccoprile rightly pointed out, might become disenchanted with the region in general and perpetuate the stereotypes of female oppression in the Middle East. I recently attended a conference in the United Arab Emirates and I, like others, was not educated about the actual situation in the majority of the Middle East. While I was there, stereotypes were shattered left and right. In Dubai where I stayed (which is admittedly liberal) there was an pervasive Muslim influence but in no way were women oppressed or denied opportunities and were fully protected under law, whether they were Muslim or not. Also attending the conference were women from Jordan, Afghanistan, Palistine among others. The general consensus was that women are granted the same opportunities, protected like American women, and are definately not oppressed in the majority of Middle Eastern countries. I hope that after reading Nisifi's memoir, readers will not come away with a negative stereotype of the Middle East as a whole. Just remember that Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan are not the only countries in the Middle East and their oppressive actions appal the majority of the Muslim population. Take into consideration that oppression tends to be newsworthy while women dancing and maintaining respectable jobs in Oman is not.
"Reading Lolita in Tehran has profoundly awakened my sense of compassion for women living oppressed lives in foreign nations. Before I read this book, veiling and other strict laws that inhibited women's rights in the Middle East always seemed unfair, but they were impersonal and I could not say that I knew much about women's situations in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and other Middle Eastern countries." Compassion for Nisifi's students and family is definately warranted, but use caution when extending this sympathy to the rest of the Middle East. Dont let the appaling actions of Iran allow a stereotype to be formed of the Middle East or Islam. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
aplussa
Honors Student
Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
![]() Posted: 19 Jan 2007 at 1:07am |
|
Book can be transformative. However, a lot depends on the mindset of the reader. Depending on society on which one grew up, the attitude, problems that worry, a book can transoforn one's worldviews. At such, I would distinuish a few factors - situational (e.g. reders' mood), social (e.g. age, fashion), and personal e.g. (own undergoing conflicts), and, certainly, the book itself, since it can appeal to one person or to many at a time.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Falo
Honors Student
Joined: 31 Mar 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
![]() Posted: 31 Mar 2007 at 4:11pm |
|
Originally posted by aplussa Book can be transformative. However, a lot depends on the mindset of the reader. Depending on society on which one grew up, the attitude, problems that worry, a book can transoforn one's worldviews. At such, I would distinuish a few factors - situational (e.g. reders' mood), social (e.g. age, fashion), and personal e.g. (own undergoing conflicts), and, certainly, the book itself, since it can appeal to one person or to many at a time. Really great point. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|